transio
09/20/2006, 04:43 PM
For those of you who don't know, CARFAX offers a pre-purchase vehicle inspection service, (EDIT: AN ON-SITE ISPECTION - NOT THE FREAKING REPORT) in which they supposedly do a "150 point inspection" and road test. Here are some details of the service. (https://secure.carfax.com/car_inspection/prePurchaseInspection150Point2.cfm)
The service is not actually performed by CARFAX - they outsource the inspection services to a company called SGS Automotive. This is important to take note of, because CARFAX doesn't take any responsibility or ownership of problems arising from SGS's services.
Well, about a month ago I was shopping for a car in Houston, TX, and I ordered a CARFAX inspection for a 2001 Audi TT (VIN# TRUWT28NX11003129). The inspection was performed Sept. 1st, 2006, and the summary report sent to me the following day.
The results of the inspection (http://stevenmoseley.com/elise/carfax_inspection.htm) showed minor problems - mostly cosmetic - with a road test showing "no noticeable defects" all around. There was no evidence of an accident reported. Based upon the inspection, which CARFAX's website claims to be performed by an expert, I flew to Houston to purchase the vehicle on Sept. 5th, 2006.
When I arrived, I found the car to be in drastically different condition than was reported. Within 5 minutes of inspection I found that the car had, in fact, been in an accident. I then had the vehicle taken to a local mechanic, who visually inspected and road tested the car and found dozens of major problems with it.
The following is list of issues not reported by the SGS inspector:
EXTERIOR:
The front bumper is damaged - obviously from a front-end collision (considering the other damage to the frontal area). It must be replaced. (The inspector listed damage to the lip, screen, and grill areas of the bumper, but not the bumper itself).
The front lip (attached underneath the bumper) is actually GLUED ON to the car, presumably after a wreck. It is badly damaged, and its mounting points are broken. It must be replaced.
The front driver's side fender is visibly bent. It is wrinkled in one corner from being warped. It must be replaced.
The driver's side headlight is loose, and sits on the car crooked.
Both headlights have 1" circles melted in the plastic housings by some kind of solvent. They must both be replaced.
The driver's side taillight housing is badly scratched. It must be replaced.
Ther driver's side door is chipped and scratched.
The frame around the front windshield has paint chips.
The passenger side fender has paint chips.
The passenger side front wheel has scuff marks.
The front fenders have spacing isues. They do not line up with the rest of the bodywork.
The rear fenders have spacing issues. They are pressed tightly together, and do not line up. They show evidence of repair, and possibly of frame damage.
This car has obviously been in an accident, and there are thousands of dollars of parts to replace. This is not "minor" as your "expert's" inspection states.
UNDER THE HOOD:
There are many aftermarket hoses.
The plastic cover for the brake fluid reservoir is broken in half (from an impact?)
The driver's side headlight was broken. It is attached to the car by metal brackets from a hardware store.
There is overspray near the right fender (evidence of repair).
There is a cold-air intake made from a gutter pipe for a house!
The hood does not close easily. It requires realignment, and may require replacement.
INTERIOR:
The back seats are completely missing!
There is a boost gauge installed in the dash, and it is showing no boost.
I didn't inspect the interior further.
TEST DRIVE:
The car idles very rough. It actually stalled during my test drive. It very obviously has mechanical problems!
The car has very weak acceleration.
The exhaust is very loud. It sounds like the vehicle has an exhaust leak.
UNDERNEATH:
The frame of the car is damaged. Specifically, there are large bends and scratches in the frame directly behind both front wheels. It appears as though the driver attempted to drive over a curb or steep elevation, and landed on the frame of the vehicle. The damage is significant, and probably irreparable.
There is oil leaking from the valve cover and the oil cooler. Both must be repaired.
The boost hose is completely detached. This explains the weak acceleration, rough idle, and 0 boost on the boost gauge.
The alignment bolts have been shifted nearly 1/2". This is evidence of frame misalignment.
There is no muffler. The exhaust is a straight pipe to the tailpipes. This explains why it sounds like an exhaust leak. It also explains why the service light is on.
TIRES:
The front and rear tires are from different manufacturers. None are Yokohama, as the report stated.
As you can see, this is an extensive list of problems. These were found in less than one hour of inspection. I didn't even complete an inspection of the interior of the car.
I detailed all of these problems to CARFAX, and they simply shrugged off responsibility and forwarded me to SGS, who claimed that their inspector's report was accurate, despite the fact that many of these problems are clearly seen in the inspector's own photos, and they refused to reimburse me for expenses I incurred as a result of their incompetence.
I suggest that anyone who's considering using this CARFAX / SGS service think twice - you'd do better to get a professional mechanic who knows what he's doing to inspect the vehicle for you.
The service is not actually performed by CARFAX - they outsource the inspection services to a company called SGS Automotive. This is important to take note of, because CARFAX doesn't take any responsibility or ownership of problems arising from SGS's services.
Well, about a month ago I was shopping for a car in Houston, TX, and I ordered a CARFAX inspection for a 2001 Audi TT (VIN# TRUWT28NX11003129). The inspection was performed Sept. 1st, 2006, and the summary report sent to me the following day.
The results of the inspection (http://stevenmoseley.com/elise/carfax_inspection.htm) showed minor problems - mostly cosmetic - with a road test showing "no noticeable defects" all around. There was no evidence of an accident reported. Based upon the inspection, which CARFAX's website claims to be performed by an expert, I flew to Houston to purchase the vehicle on Sept. 5th, 2006.
When I arrived, I found the car to be in drastically different condition than was reported. Within 5 minutes of inspection I found that the car had, in fact, been in an accident. I then had the vehicle taken to a local mechanic, who visually inspected and road tested the car and found dozens of major problems with it.
The following is list of issues not reported by the SGS inspector:
EXTERIOR:
The front bumper is damaged - obviously from a front-end collision (considering the other damage to the frontal area). It must be replaced. (The inspector listed damage to the lip, screen, and grill areas of the bumper, but not the bumper itself).
The front lip (attached underneath the bumper) is actually GLUED ON to the car, presumably after a wreck. It is badly damaged, and its mounting points are broken. It must be replaced.
The front driver's side fender is visibly bent. It is wrinkled in one corner from being warped. It must be replaced.
The driver's side headlight is loose, and sits on the car crooked.
Both headlights have 1" circles melted in the plastic housings by some kind of solvent. They must both be replaced.
The driver's side taillight housing is badly scratched. It must be replaced.
Ther driver's side door is chipped and scratched.
The frame around the front windshield has paint chips.
The passenger side fender has paint chips.
The passenger side front wheel has scuff marks.
The front fenders have spacing isues. They do not line up with the rest of the bodywork.
The rear fenders have spacing issues. They are pressed tightly together, and do not line up. They show evidence of repair, and possibly of frame damage.
This car has obviously been in an accident, and there are thousands of dollars of parts to replace. This is not "minor" as your "expert's" inspection states.
UNDER THE HOOD:
There are many aftermarket hoses.
The plastic cover for the brake fluid reservoir is broken in half (from an impact?)
The driver's side headlight was broken. It is attached to the car by metal brackets from a hardware store.
There is overspray near the right fender (evidence of repair).
There is a cold-air intake made from a gutter pipe for a house!
The hood does not close easily. It requires realignment, and may require replacement.
INTERIOR:
The back seats are completely missing!
There is a boost gauge installed in the dash, and it is showing no boost.
I didn't inspect the interior further.
TEST DRIVE:
The car idles very rough. It actually stalled during my test drive. It very obviously has mechanical problems!
The car has very weak acceleration.
The exhaust is very loud. It sounds like the vehicle has an exhaust leak.
UNDERNEATH:
The frame of the car is damaged. Specifically, there are large bends and scratches in the frame directly behind both front wheels. It appears as though the driver attempted to drive over a curb or steep elevation, and landed on the frame of the vehicle. The damage is significant, and probably irreparable.
There is oil leaking from the valve cover and the oil cooler. Both must be repaired.
The boost hose is completely detached. This explains the weak acceleration, rough idle, and 0 boost on the boost gauge.
The alignment bolts have been shifted nearly 1/2". This is evidence of frame misalignment.
There is no muffler. The exhaust is a straight pipe to the tailpipes. This explains why it sounds like an exhaust leak. It also explains why the service light is on.
TIRES:
The front and rear tires are from different manufacturers. None are Yokohama, as the report stated.
As you can see, this is an extensive list of problems. These were found in less than one hour of inspection. I didn't even complete an inspection of the interior of the car.
I detailed all of these problems to CARFAX, and they simply shrugged off responsibility and forwarded me to SGS, who claimed that their inspector's report was accurate, despite the fact that many of these problems are clearly seen in the inspector's own photos, and they refused to reimburse me for expenses I incurred as a result of their incompetence.
I suggest that anyone who's considering using this CARFAX / SGS service think twice - you'd do better to get a professional mechanic who knows what he's doing to inspect the vehicle for you.