^^i agree! and i have to say....i am actually pretty okay at go-karts! fun stuff!
That was back when CG was cool, now it’s just a lazy way to save money.
Yeah, CG should be used only when conventional effects absolutely cannot accomplish the same thing. Take the movie Species for instance, or Alien 3. Both of those films would have been sooooo much better had they stayed away from CG as much as possible. IMO, CG has got to be TOP NOTCH (as in LOTR or Transformers) to be successful. Otherwise, its just crap.
Bart
I now that CG was really going down hill when a first saw to movie The Mummy Returns. Up to that point most of the CG out there was fairly decent, there where some bad apples but not many. Then this peace of crap came out and you could tell the CG was all about saving money. It was a taste of things to come.
Yeah, I never watched any of the Mummy movies. I am not a fan of Brendan Fraiser or the films. For me, it was Alien 3 and Species. Both of those movies use such god awful digital effects, that it really made me hate CG. It wasn't until I saw The Matrix that I started thinking differently. And then with LOTR, I realized that when done right, CG works and looks awesome. Gollum looked fantastic. Its funny though, watch The Matrix today and the effects look a little dated.
Bart
Hay! Stop messing with my delusions…. If you ever get an extra 1hr and 40 minutes, I’m not kidding. Watch this YouTube video on the history of CG. It will change your life, or bore the living crap out of you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjSExqtiIyg
I’m surprised they didn’t fix it in the DVD release.
I made this for you Bart.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]"If its fast and reliable, its not cheap;
if its fast and cheap, its not reliable;
if its cheap and reliable, its not fast."
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?