HB Scott Larson

[Y33TREKker]

What was "veiled" about Scott's statement? It seemed pretty straight forward to me.

Either way, on the internet, it's simply empty posturing that someone Scott's age should have grown out of years ago.

Apparently, you've never heard the saying: "friends are the family that you get to choose"

Sure I have, but what does that have to do with what I said?

Errrrr...unless it'll co$t .5479452 cents a day... O-M-G...

Just not capable of letting it go that it's in fact you who misunderstood my comments on the subject from the start are you.

I'm gonna have to defer to Pee Wee Herman here...

I KNOW you are, what am I?

I just explained it to you. Oh that's right, explanations are wasted on you.

Really... an almost grown man believing in birthday wishes?

C'mon...REALLY?

Hey, I figured maybe a childish wish would be just the ticket for addressing childish behavior. It was worth a shot anyway.

[Ldub]

Either way, on the internet, it's simply empty posturing that someone Scott's age should have grown out of years ago.


Sure I have, but what does that have to do with what I said?



Just not capable of letting it go that it's in fact you who misunderstood my comments on the subject from the start are you.


I just explained it to you. Oh that's right, explanations are wasted on you.



Hey, I figured maybe a childish wish would be just the ticket for addressing childish behavior. It was worth a shot anyway.

You're redundancy is showing again, also your sentences are becoming more fragmented, & MUCH less well thought out...

I would'v changed the second childish to: "immature"...good sentence structure depends heavily upon variety...

Ja run outta meds or sump'n ?...

In any event, that's all well & good...

I'm-a-gonna just sit here in my living room, & wait patiently until I hear a REALLY loud popping sound...

When I hear it, I'll assume that it was the moment (with the speed of sound, & friction of trees factored in) that you finally pulled your head outcha back side...

with that...

Oh, & btw...

"you who misunderstood my comments on the subject from the start are you."

WTF???.. now you think you're YODA?...for gawds sake man...GET A GRIP!

...you should be reporting my eternal trek & toadie abuse here...

Sorry...

I'm tapp'n out gang, while it's been major fun goin' a few rounds wit the T-man, & to a much lesser extent, toadie boy, the same rhetorical ----rdation has gott'n me to a point of boredom...

Y'all take care of it from here.....

HAPPY BIRFDAY SCOTT !!!!!

[VXR]

my redundancy is showing again

I can't stop

We know

[Ldub]

We know

You're really coming along...

Some day you'll be able to reply to quotes NOT taken out of context...

[Y33TREKker]

While these comments are as interesting/revealing in their own ways as always, they're really amounting to nothing more than an echo chamber at this point (and some ironically say that it's me who has gotten redundant?), so all I'll ask is that you consider the following things.

If ldub himself is of the opinion that .5479452 cents a day should be viewed as such an infinitessimal amount of money, why has that infinitessimal amount resulted in him and some others resorting to the moral assassination of others in one way or another for so long now on this website, including all of the time and effort towards redundancy he himself has once again displayed in this thread? Just another example of some of you apparently wanting things to go your way in both directions...and ldub specifically still trying to get others to subsidize his internet time...

And it's interesting that any of you would have characterized my comments as starving for attention and/or not being capable of letting things go too, especially when you are simultaneously totally giving members like ldub a complete pass for continually showing up in threads where what I'm commenting on more often than not has nothing to do with him, where he's then proceeded to bring up subjects from months and months ago and endlessly repeat the same old crap. If you want an actual example of someone starving for attention who apparently can't let things go....well there you go....and I'm obviously not the only person who's noticed.

(And seriously, ldub still trying to suggest that he of all people should be regarded as the grammar police of all things? He should REALLY, REALLY, consider putting that on his list if things to let go to save himself any further embarrassment...but then he's never seemed to be that predisposed to objectively viewing his own comments here, so let's just say I'm not expecting much on that front either....)

And since he's felt it necessary to bring things out in the open, and is still trying to make me the bad guy using anything he apparently can, it may interest some of you to know that in those PM's Scott mentioned regarding the work-related personal reference (where he was offering all of that encouragement), that exchange was initiated by him because he simply wanted to also encourage me when dealing with some of you because he considered some of you lost causes when it came to admitting your conveniently biased opinions here.

I know I've already said this in this thread, but in light of Scott now resorting to whatever he apparently thinks he can to make me the bad guy, this bears repeating.

Scott himself suggested that he viewed me as having a history of becoming involved in discussions such as what this one has become, so if he was aware of that, why would he have chosen to lay out the type of bait that would possibly get another one started by initially asking me "why I would think his comment had been directed at me"...as opposed to just saying "no", especially knowing what we know now where he's verified himself that his comment wasn't directed at me.

It takes two to tango after all....and him subsequently trying to publicly lay the total blame at my feet at a time when he knew I wasn't to blame is why I then told him to %$&* off. I tried to keep the public board civil by saying that via PM, but if he's now going to try to use that PM in a public manner too as a way of still somehow trying to make me the bad guy, it's obvious that it doesn't even seem to matter to HIM where the comments take place...a thread about rims...via PM...or his own personal birthday thread.

Can't have it both ways.

[Ldub]

And seriously, at 56 you're still talking about solving your differences with people by fighting? OK, so maybe not 8...we'll be generous and move you on up to 15.

Can't have it both ways.

...

[VXR]

Then stop reading them

[Y33TREKker]

...

.
.
.
.
.
What I didn't mention while relaying that story was that it happened when my friend and I were TEENAGERS. There's a difference between when a teenager does it and when a 56-year-old does it.

I participated in my fair share don't get me wrong, but I grew out of it and now consider such actions a last resort.

[Ldub]

If ldub himself is of the opinion that .5479452 cents a day should be viewed as such an infinitessimal amount of money, why has that infinitessimal amount resulted in him and some others resorting to the moral assassination of others in one way or another for so long now bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla blaand ldub specifically still trying to get others to subsidize his internet time...

Ummmm...you're about the only one that seems to mind me beating the Site Support drum now & then...those of my friends, who aren't site supporters, don't care even slightly. They're all big boys, who know it's entirely their choice...
For whatever reason, (my guess, a massive inferiority complex, with persecution & paranoia added on top for sprinkles, but that's another thread entirely) your panties get all bunched up & you go off on yet another childish tirade when ANYBODY mentions site support...WTF?...

Also, any "moral assination" (special word, just for you) you have perceived, has ALWAYS been a direct response to your pantywaist, crybaby rants AGAINST site support. Again...WTF???

Without site support from individuals who use the site, the burden of server co$ts & upkeep would fall squarely on ONE SET of shoulders...those belonging to Moncha.
Do you seriously think that he should be the $ole provider of a place for you to whimper & whine?...do you think the VXinfo doors would remain open without user generated fund$???

Do You Think?

Ever?

Get a clue.

[Y33TREKker]

Ummmm...you're about the only one that seems to mind me beating the Site Support drum now & then...those of my friends, who aren't site supporters, don't care even slightly. They're all big boys, who know it's entirely their choice...
For whatever reason, (my guess, a massive inferiority complex, with persecution & paranoia added on top for sprinkles, but that's another thread entirely) your panties get all bunched up & you go off on yet another childish tirade when ANYBODY mentions site support...WTF?...

Also, any "moral assination" (special word, just for you) you have perceived, has ALWAYS been a direct response to your pantywaist, crybaby rants AGAINST site support. Again...WTF???

Without site support from individuals who use the site, the burden of server co$ts & upkeep would fall squarely on ONE SET of shoulders...those belonging to Moncha.
Do you seriously think that he should be the $ole provider of a place for you to whimper & whine?...do you think the VXinfo doors would remain open without user generated fund$???

Do You Think?

Ever?

Get a clue.

Then again, I'd suggest that most haven't bothered to chime in because they've seen from watching you respond to me what a lost cause it is to try to explain anything to you.

And I can't believe I'm having to explain this to you AGAIN since we've already been through it all a couple of times in the past, but I've NEVER said I had a problem with you suggesting site support, only HOW you've suggested it at times. You always seem to conveniently overlook that detail though...just like you did again this time. Simply more evidence of this being a lost cause.

I've illustrated that YOU have THE HIGHEST POST COUNT of ANYONE ELSE HERE, but you apparently expect others to believe you don't have a vested interest in trying to coerce others into site donation (or in other words...subsidizing your vx.info internet time) with your moral assassinations directed at ALL who don't make site donations?

You can try to sugar-coat it all you want to try to make what you do less obvious, but you're only fooling yourself if you think it works on everyone, or that no one can put two and two together.

We realize that just because that kind of complex addition is apparently difficult for you to comprehend, it makes it difficult for you to imagine anyone else being able to, but the fact of the matter is that there are actually people out there whose actions aren't based solely on their own little world of self-interests.