scared meself!!!

[Y33TREKker]

Most of my imaginary friends had disappeared by the time I was 3 or 4...I still have a couple, but DUDE...rlly?

"Random collection of members" sounds like a structure with no leg to stand on... or a maybe a gay porno... or maybe a gay porno with no leg to stand on! "Thaaat's naaasty..."

Well as I've already said, any or all of you (and you apparently know who you are) are free to believe what I've said is not true if you like, but you believing it doesn't make it a reality.

[Y33TREKker]

WTF???

Why so SNARKY?

I was honestly asking your opinion as to why you feel the current solution yields different results than my original 'proposed' approach.

If you'd rather just pick at the scab from earlier discussions though, I'll let it go.

Snarky?

That's a convenient way for you to try to portray my answer Tom, especially when what you're asking me now has ONCE AGAIN been changed from what you were asking before.

When you conveniently change your questions like that, OF COURSE the previous answer isn't going to apply to the current question, but resorting to such things to try to direct attention away from your own confusion only makes you appear to be the person picking at scabs from earlier discussions.

Once again though, your original "proposed" approach didn't include the vent-to-atmosphere-filter being used in your current solution...so it simply isn't the same setup you keep telling yourself it is...

[Y33TREKker]

Sooooooooo....it hasn't become abundantly clear to you?

It's everyone else....most definitely NOT tha chi-pom.

SHEESH...try N keep up, will ya?...

BTW, what'd ya use for baffling in your can?

Proving yourself ALSO unable to follow along...

[Y33TREKker]

That's a rather personal question there Dub...what's in his can is his business!

Interesting that that's where YOU went with that.

[Scott Larson]

Leave it to you to go "literally" mental over a typo.

From you I usually expect nothing more though.

I think I shall name you "Princess", that sounds all self-important and shall we say, "yappy". From such a regal little pooch I would not expect such grammatical errors, so in the future please proof-read your posts and refrain from extemporaneous "yapping"...Don't make me get the bark collar!! Now, go lay down by your dish!!

[Ldub]

but you believing it doesn't make it a reality.

likewise, i'm sure...


can't believe you've fallen back on tha "i know you are, what am i" retort...though no one expects much more of you...

[Ldub]

Interesting that that's where YOU went with that.

all everyone else sees..."i know you are, what am i?"

[VX KAT]

Yap,yap, yap, yap, yap, yap, nip, nip, nip, nip, nip...ad nauseam! There Trekkie, hows that for original my little Pom-Chi?

Hey now wait a minute here, my Pom resembles that remark!
Just ask Dub!

Most of my imaginary friends had disappeared by the time I was 3 or 4...I still have a couple, but DUDE...rlly?

"Random collection of members" sounds like a structure with no leg to stand on... or a maybe a gay porno... or maybe a gay porno with no leg to stand on! "Thaaat's naaasty..."

Mebbe took Willie to tha house of mirrors?...

Sooooooooo....it hasn't become abundantly clear to you?

It's everyone else....most definitely NOT tha chi-pom.

SHEESH...try N keep up, will ya?...

Hey, yuz be insultin' me Pom again!
Don't make me have cute little cuddly Teddy Bear come over there..... again!

Nah, I'm a leeeetle dense. Prolly comes from being wrong so often despite the fact that I tell everyone that I'm never wrong.

Don't make me get the bark collar!! Now, go lay down by your dish!!

.

[ZEUS]

Well as I've already said, any or all of you (and you apparently know who you are) are free to believe what I've said is not true if you like, but you believing it doesn't make it a reality.

Hey, I just think "Random collection of members" sounds funny! With that said though, I have been tempted to ask you to start a poll regarding these apparently atrocious contrasting views you repeatedly mention. Votes are anonymous. I want to see how many peeps you are in cahoots with behind the scenes - 1 or 5 or 50 or 100?! Obviously, that is the exact opposite of the 'ignore' function. However, it could be very simple & perhaps even educational fun (I already have some rules & goals of a game all written out)... what do ya say? Are you ready for us all to realize your following?

[Ldub]

Hey, I just think "Random collection of members" sounds funny! With that said though, I have been tempted to ask you to start a poll regarding these apparently atrocious contrasting views you repeatedly mention. Votes are anonymous. I want to see how many peeps you are in cahoots with behind the scenes - 1 or 5 or 50 or 100?! Obviously, that is the exact opposite of the 'ignore' function. However, it could be very simple & perhaps even educational fun (I already have some rules & goals of a game all written out)... what do ya say? Are you ready for us all to realize your following?

where's that dam "like" button when ya need it...

[tom4bren]

Snarky?

SNARKY - yep, I find your demeanor very abrasive.

That's a convenient way for you to try to portray my answer Tom, especially when what you're asking me now has ONCE AGAIN been changed from what you were asking before.

Nope. I've asked you the same question 3 times now. How is the end result of what I've done different from what I originally proposed? Venting to atmosphere should have the same effect on crank case pressure as venting to the combustion chamber in my mind. I'm just curious as to why you feel it's different.

When you conveniently change your questions like that, OF COURSE the previous answer isn't going to apply to the current question, but resorting to such things to try to direct attention away from your own confusion only makes you appear to be the person picking at scabs from earlier discussions.

T'wasn't confused. Merely asking your opinion since you have positioned yourself as the ultimate authority on the subject.

Once again though, your original "proposed" approach didn't include the vent-to-atmosphere-filter being used in your current solution...so it simply isn't the same setup you keep telling yourself it is...

I never said it was the same solution. I said it was a different approach to the same result.

Let me explain myself one more time so that you don't have to search through hundreds of posts looking for the perfect quote.

I still feel that a crossover tube would be a means of removing one variable from the problem we experience with oil consumption. I don't feel that it is the source of all of the issue but it's easy enough to install one to find out ... except that I didn't think it through in regard to drilling the hole in the valve cover without introducing metal shavings into the crank case. That's the reason that I went with the vent filter temporarily. It's just not worth removing the valve cover at this point in time (I will however drill a hole in Boy's valve cover since it's already off). This is absolutely a Research & Development (R&D) scenario so changes to the concept are not only acceptable, they are expected.

[VXobsession]

This is one of the best threads I've read since I've been a member...

[tom4bren]

This is one of the best threads I've read since I've been a member...

My boy, you definitely have a warped sense of 'enjoyment'

[dietz99vcross]

This is like the tabloid magazine that you just have to read and then you feel dirty and disappointed that you wasted the time reading it, only to do the same thing when the next edition comes out. Looking forward to the next edition already.

[VXobsession]

My boy, you definitely have a warped sense of 'enjoyment'

I'm a girl....with 3 VX's....

...and yes, my sense of enjoyment is way more warped than it should be