Theoretical Question: Why didn't we just remove Saddam and Sons, check for wmd, kill the small group of terrorists who were operating on the northeast Iranian border, then get out and leave the bathists in charge?
I know, I know they would still be our enemies and all ... but I think the question exposes the untruths of the official reasons for the war.
The way we did it now means we will always have bases there. Even if there ends up being a civil war, our troups will retreat behind the concertina wire and wait it out.
We have a permanent presence in the heart of our enemy.
Another point: I think GW just likes being a wartime president just a little too much. I've seen him refer to himself that way and he's smiling as he's saying it. I can't imagine any other recent president showing so much obvious enjoyment in having that sad and sobering role.
Back during the invasion of Iraq I remember a reporter asking him about suicide attacks on our troops and he just smiled and said "bring it on!".
I was embarrased for our country and felt sorry for the soldiers stuck over there with the prez saying bring on the attacks. Some must have been very concerned at that. It seemed irresponsible.
Reply With Quote